I have lately been revisiting what I have always felt is one of the most confusing and frustrating verses in the Bible: Proverbs 22:6. We’ve all read it and memorized and at times have found both aggravation and solace in its simple yet profound message.
“Train a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not turn from it.”
When I was a young parent I clung to that verse as a promise that my attempts to train and discipline my children would someday be rewarded with their compliance. When my children were teenagers I felt guilty each time I read that same verse. Surely I had failed miserably to train them in the way they should go, because they were totally ignoring at least half the things I thought I had taught them, and they certainly weren’t following a path I would have chosen for them. Now that they are adults I am still baffled by some of the things they do, not because their actions are necessarily bad, but just because their path is so different from their upbringing that I wonder how they found it.
I’m positive that my own parents felt the same way.
And the parents of my students often share similar concerns with me.
Which brings me to some questions about that verse:
How much training? The Bible admonishes us to teach our children daily, constantly. Does anything less constitute failure? Is it enough to talk and guide and be a role model? Or must the training be much more formal? Does it apply to daily life skills or only Biblical truths?
How old does a child have to be to return to the training of his childhood? I seem to recall a few people in the Bible who were trained in godly ways but were certainly disobedient adults. My young adult children are not attending the church of their childhood or practicing many of the things they were taught as children. Do they have to be really old to return to the ways of their childhood training? 50, 60, 70? I don’t attend the church I was raised in. I don’t believe some of the things I was taught as a child. Will I finally change my mind when I’m 80?
How about all those years in between child and old? Some groups, such as the Amish, actually expect their youth to “go wild” for a time- they call it Rumspringa. Others such as the Mormons, try to control their youth with a highly structured culture and service expectations. The Jews have a formal ceremony (Bar or Bat Mitzvah) signifying a child’s maturity and responsibility for their own actions. Christianity seems to adopt a bit of each- we want our teens to behave well in every situation, but we know from the experience of our own teen years that it is unlikely that they will. We try to give them other things to do besides get into trouble, but we know they can serve the Lord on Sunday and be in serious trouble with their peers on Tuesday. We let them be children for as long as possible, but tend to hold them accountable for their actions once they start driving and aren’t under our scrutiny all the time.
Perhaps we are all taking the verse too literally. It becomes a troubling conundrum if we think of ourselves as trainers. My own life has been more of a roller coaster than a path. How can I expect my children to follow my training when I’m not sure I followed my parents’ training? People have been going astray for generations. And their parents probably puzzled over this verse for the same reasons we do. When I find myself totally at a loss I file my confusion under “things too wonderful for me”. I remind myself that my mind is small and my knowledge limited. And I re-read Psalms 139:1-6.
O Lord, You have searched me and known me.
2 You know my sitting down and my rising up;
You understand my thought afar off.
3 You comprehend my path and my lying down,
And are acquainted with all my ways.
4 For there is not a word on my tongue,
But behold, O Lord, You know it altogether.
5 You have hedged me behind and before,
And laid Your hand upon me.
6 Such knowledge is too wonderful for me;
It is high, I cannot attain it.

I took a class last semester that I viewed in light of this same biblical passage: In the last ten years, brain imaging has provided some additional information to "answer" this question. These studies show that the infant's brain has billions more synapsis than our adult brains. The "training" of the pathways is done by the "use it or lose it" system... so what we repeatedly expose, teach, or require of the child creates a brain pathway... like a sapling that is "trained" a certain direction, and whose branches are pruned to shape the overall tree. Those synapsis that are repeated most and most often, become the deepest patterns of thought upon which the child-to-adult will act. However, we have found that our brains can continue to grow, even after age 24, which is when the brain "officially" finishes normal development ... so a child-to-adult can create some new pathways, but these "new" branches are built upon whatever network was already there ... they are "departed from" which implies separated, but are built upon (they don't come from the brand new cells that migrated frm the brain stem in the development of the womb)... so, when he is old... he will not depart from whatever was trained in his/her brain when he was a child. The new development can be seen as a new limb coming from the trunk... and the more often the new thought-behavior is rehearsed, the thicker/stronger that new limb might be... but there is often a process of "regression" from the lesser developed branches when we get old... regression back to the childlike behavior that was "trained up in us" (ie., spoiled brat children tend to make spoiled brat elderly patients; polite children tend to make polite elderly patients... even if both had "diverted" during mid-years). Brain scans from the Amen clinic show that the brain that received parenting that was strong on discipline (even harsh/abuse discipline, which I'm not recommending) is better developed than those parented under permissive/lax approaches. Add to this what we might glean from the story of the prodigal Son which says that "when he came to his senses, he looked back on his Father's house and saw"... though he had obviously made some behavior choices that came out of thoughts that were abberant to his Father's teaching (sounds like human self will - and the fact that the last part of the brain to develop is the "executive functioning" part - that gives us the abilty to make judgments and put the brakes on our impulses... hence an explanation for the aliens we have to live with called teenagers)... the prodigal coming back to his senses seems to indicate that the prodigal had some kind of training to come back to... how can he "come back to" something that wasn't there in the first place. So. Parents. God gives us many stern reminders that we need to actively train our children. Yes. They may act on self-willed (or society-endorsed) thoughts that we didn't "train" them with and chose behaviors and lifestyles that we are concerned about. But if we don't train them, the hopes of them coming back are greatly diminished if not impossible (brain research is clear that there are developmental windows of opportunity). And... one more thing... from what I learned about infant brain development... I would not have any "artificial" noise(media) in my house for the first three years of my children's lives if I had it to do over again. (We had very little TV/games based on my parental/Christian objections to most media content.... but I would have NONE now based on the noise-brain-training issues alone.) We are training generations of children to develop brains that deem "normal functioning" with arcade-type atmospheric stimulus... no wonder these little ones can't sit still in class... unless, that is, they have a teacher who can send as many visual and auditory signals at them at once as can a TV, video game, etc. Should we then wonder why there is such an appetite for drama in our society?
Posted by: Debra | January 27, 2013 at 09:57 PM
Thanks for the information Debra. I have long thought that our newest generation has difficulty listening in class because there is so much noise in their homes.
Posted by: mary | January 28, 2013 at 05:52 AM
I agree about brain scans. It seems neuroscience is both helping us understand brain development and the things we can do or can't do to help while also proving that sometimes inheritance is the cause of behavior---not just personal choice. Some people are just not wired properly. The ramifications are only now beginning to be speculated about.
You know the motivation for my own personal interest in the matter.
Posted by: Megan | January 29, 2013 at 02:41 PM